The Politics of Exclusion and the Need for Transparency
The recent ousting of Ruby from the Liberal Party’s leadership race has sparked a wave of controversy, raising questions about fairness, evidence, and the integrity of political processes. The party claims her removal was due to financial irregularities and foreign interference, yet the lack of transparency surrounding these allegations has left many skeptical. This incident is not just about one individual; it is about the broader implications for democracy, accountability, and the treatment of marginalized voices in politics. The Liberals have positioned themselves as a party of high moral standing, yet their handling of this situation suggests otherwise. The absence of publicly disclosed evidence against Ruby stands in stark contrast to the party’s swift action to remove her. This raises legitimate concerns: When did the party become aware of these allegations? Were they known before she entered the race, or only after? And why is Ruby being singled out when there are reportedly 11 ...